AF-S NIKKOR
300mm f/2.8G ED VR II
Professional, fast-aperture super telephoto lens, now enhanced with Nikon VR II image stabilization and featuring Nano Crystal Coat, is an ideal choice for sports photography, live performance shooting, wildlife and more.
$5,899.95*SRPSRP (Suggested Retail Price) listed only as a suggestion. Actual prices are set by dealers and are subject to change at any time.
Close
Supplied Accessories
- 52mm filter holder
- 52mm Nikon NC Filter
- LN-1 strap
- HK-30 Slip-on lens hood
- CL-L1 semi-soft case
- Slip-on Front lens cover
- Rear lens cap
/Views/87_4152_CL-L1-Ballistic-Nylon-Soft-Case_front.png)
-Clear_No-Tint-Filter_front.png){kind=spacer}
AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II
8
8
Bucket List
This lens was on my bucket list since the late 1970s when a friend had one on a shoot with me and let me try it. I finally purchased one.
I have to say this glass is the finest glass I've ever owned bar none. If I do my part, it can produce brilliant images with amazing micro contrast and tonal blending. It's also razor sharp wherever you want it from wide open to stopped down a good bit.
One thing to mention is the obvious. It can be heavy to hand hold for a fairly long time and at least a monopod comes in handy if just to give me a rest.
With a Nikon 1.7 converter, it has so little degradation that I rarely carry my old Nikon 500 f/4-P in the field anymore. The 300 f/2.8 gives me 500 f/4.8 in the EXIF with this converter, so I'm not losing anything much and it's much lighter and faster to use on birds, perched or in flight.
It also makes a superb portrait lens, with or without the converter. The unique perspective will give you a change for the good from your standard portrait glass. It also allows you to stand far enough back outside as to allow a little more candid images of your kids or grandkids.
If you're like me and getting older but want that ultimate glass in this focal range, please do yourself a favor and afford it while you can
August 8, 2011
Outstanding sharpness.
I recently purchased the Nikon 300mm 2.8 VR II lens and my first use was to shoot the launch of STS-134 from the NASA Causeway. I was 6.3 miles from the launch site. I mounted the 300 on a TC 17 E II teleconverter and my Nikon D300. The rig was of course mounted on a tripod. The pictures are amazing. Too bad about the cloudy sky but still very, very nice. I am quite pleased.
June 23, 2011
excellent quality and performance
This is an excellent lens, it's a little bulky but it's what I use when I want a good telephoto with low ISO in an active environment. I frequently shoot this lens at f/2.8 and always like the results.
June 9, 2011
I use this lens for sports and nature photography. The fast focus is incredible, and the sharpness is incomparable. Although heavy, used on a tripod or bi pod, the weight is unnoticeable. This lens is just what the doctor ordered.....Love it.
April 16, 2011
Surprisingly versatile lens
I was familiar with the great color rendition this lens provides, the reach and the focusing speed.
I was unprepared for the beautiful OOF rendering and the ability of the lens to create fine portrait shots. The 2.8 and the nano really seems to make all of the difference in the world.
April 14, 2011
Industry Recognition
1 Question | 1 Answer
Product Q&A
Ask your questions. Share your answers.
1 Question | 1 Answer
Have a new question?
Ask a new question Search the Product Forum
All Questions
1 of 1
All
All
AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II
1 answer
Compare optics of Nikon 200-400 f/4 VR2 with Nikon 300 f/2.8 + 1.4 TC, both with approximately 400 mm focal length.
I am currently using a Nikon 80-400 VR lens with a Nikon D7000, and want to upgrade the lens, primarily for bird photography, and want to avoid tripod use. I was advised by a fellow photographer that the 300 mm VR2 with the 1.4 TC will technically surpass the 200-400 VR2 at the 400 (420)mm range, and is easier to carry around and shoot with. I already have the 80-400 VR lens, and want to make a wise upgrade purchase that I will be happy with. Probably 95% or more of my photos are at 400 mm, and all are hand-held.
1 year, 1 month ago
by
swimmdoc
CT
Location :
CT
Age: 55-65
Favorite Subject: Nature
Nikon Family: 21+ years
Experience: More than a year
Role: Serious passion, hobbyist
1 answer
Answers
Answer:
Each have there advantages, I use a 200-400 and it is superb, even with a 1.4 and 1.7 tc on it. I dare say the 300 might give you slighlty better image quality but what you gain with that you lose on the flexibilty of having a decent zoom. Either way if you are trying to avoid using a tripod I would have a rethink as both of these you wouldnt want to hand hold for too long unless you are an Arnie type bodybuilder, minimum would be a monopd for either of them.If possible try and rent both for a week or so see which is going to be most suitable for your needs.
1 of 1
1 of 1
Close
Award Winner
2010-2011 EISA European Professional Lens award
The European Imaging and Sound Association (EISA) crowned the AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II interchangeable lens with the 2010-2011 EISA European Professional Lens award. EISA was impressed with the 300mm lens’ three ED glass elements and Nano Crystal Coat. Highlighting its fast f/2.8 maximum aperture and Nikon’s VR II vibration reduction system, the EISA touted the AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II lens “a guarantee of excellent image quality, even in the most difficult lighting conditions.”
Close
Award Winner
Lens of the Year
PDN named the AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II Lens of the Year, in the PDN 2010 Photo Gear of the Year. Technology editor Dan Havlik noted that the lens offers excellent sharpness and true-to-life color. In his review, Havlik said that with this lens, Nikon has made a bold step in the pro sports photography market.
December 2010
We’ll keep track of the products you view here.